Money
Deposit assumption used when a cap or minimum deposit affects the practical offer value.
EUR
Range: 1 to 10000Interactive calculator
Offer comparison
Change the inputs, compare scenarios and see the results before you believe a banner number or an RTP.
Adjust the assumptions
Change the assumptions below and watch how the estimate moves as the deposit, RTP, wagering or pace changes.
Free spins details
Enter the spin package and the wagering context you want to assess.
Money
Theoretical stake assumption used to convert free-spin counts into value.
EUR
Range: 0.1 to 100Percent
Theoretical RTP applied to the selected game mix.
%
Range: 50 to 100Percent
Used when a promotion does not have structured game contribution rules.
%
Range: 0 to 100Play assumptions
Set your usual playing style.
Money
Average stake used to estimate rounds and time-to-clear.
EUR
Range: 0.1 to 1000Integer
Shared pace assumption for clearance estimates.
Range: 1 to 2000
All calculations are estimates based on the values entered.
A bigger percentage does not mean a better offer
Two offers are comparable only once both have been converted into the same unit: expected value in euros. The advertised percentage is not that. "590% up to $1,000" with a 50× requirement is almost always worse than "100% up to €200" with a 25× requirement, even though the first number is six times bigger.
Three inputs that make the decision. The wagering multiplier and whether it is calculated on the bonus or on the bonus plus the deposit (the latter doubles the requirement). Game weighting, which multiplies the turnover when reduced. Max bet, which determines how long the clearing takes and how large the risk of cancellation is.
A fourth, often forgotten: the max cashout. Many bonuses cap how much of a win arising from the bonus can be withdrawn. A large bonus with a €100 withdrawal cap is a smaller offer than a small bonus with no cap — the max cashout calculator shows the difference.
A crypto casino peculiarity. Here there is a third option the ordinary market does not have: not taking a bonus at all. Several large houses pay rakeback with no wagering requirement, and for a steady player that is almost always worth more than any one-off offer. Always compare that option as a third column — see the list of houses without wagering and the rakeback offers.
If both results come out negative, that is an honest answer: neither offer is worth it and the best move is to decline the bonus. At most houses it can be left out of the selection.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: a big bonus or a small requirement?
Almost always the small requirement. Convert both into expected value — the requirement affects the result more than the size of the bonus.
Is rakeback an offer?
Yes, and often the best one. Unlike a bonus it is free money immediately, with nothing to clear.